By Frazer Rice
For much of the past decade, year-end planning meant racing a cliff. Estate planners told clients to use their exemption before it disappeared. Income tax planners braced for a return to higher rates.
That urgency is gone. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made the federal estate and gift tax exemption permanent and eliminated the scheduled 2026 reduction. The planning opportunity has not disappeared. It has become more sophisticated.
The better question for the fourth quarter is which decisions the economics, the valuation, or the succession plan make right for 2026, not whether an exemption is about to expire. That shift rewards disciplined, multiyear planning, and it penalizes families who wait until a sale, a death, or a dispute turns a planning project into an emergency.
Readers pressed for time can skip to the fourth-quarter calendar near the end for the full year-end checklist.
A handful of figures anchor this year's planning conversation:
These figures are general. Your tax advisor can confirm what applies to your specific return.
Start with a real 2026 income projection, built around where the income comes from, what kind it is, when it happens, and how much control you have over it, rather than a rough guess based on last year's return.
A useful forecast separates:
Determining the bracket is only the starting point. The real decision is whether income should be sped up, delayed, shifted within the family where lawful, offset, or turned into a different type of income. Individuals who expect meaningfully lower income in 2027 may have a reason to defer discretionary income. And those with a 2026 sale, sizable deductions, or unused capital losses may benefit from recognizing gain before year-end. The right answer depends on the full model: state taxes, expected future rates, cash flow, investment return, charitable intent, and estate objectives.
Many families still treat the income tax consequences of a nongrantor trust as an afterthought. In 2026, that habit will be expensive. A trust reaches the 37% federal bracket above $16,000 of taxable income, a threshold vastly lower than the comparable figure for an individual.
That calls for a review of:
Retaining income in trust is often the correct outcome. Asset protection, family governance, and beneficiary circumstances can justify paying more tax. The mistake is treating the result as automatic rather than reviewed. Trust taxation involves both tax and legal judgment calls; your tax advisor and attorney should weigh in together.
Roth conversions remain useful in years when income is temporarily depressed, deductions are unusually high, or an individual has a long investment horizon and expects higher future marginal rates. A conversion can reduce future required distributions from the converted assets, but it also accelerates taxable income now, so it should be modeled against Medicare, state tax, cash flow, charitable, and inheritance considerations.
Conversion analysis should weigh more than the federal bracket:
The better question is not whether Roth conversions are advisable in general, but whether paying tax today, at a known combined marginal rate, improves the family's outcome once spending, charitable, investment, and inheritance plans are modeled together. Treatment depends on your income for the year and how you file. Confirm with your tax advisor before acting.
For a family with a meaningful annual giving budget, philanthropy is no longer a line item to finalize in December. The 0.5% of adjusted gross income floor and the 35-cent cap on itemized benefits for top-bracket taxpayers change the arithmetic behind every gift, not just the timing of it. A family that itemizes should quantify projected adjusted gross income and total annual giving before choosing a vehicle, not after. None of this touches a family's underlying reason for giving, only the mechanics of how and when that giving gets funded. For families making large gifts, the choice of vehicle can affect the tax result, so it helps to compare options before year-end.
Several structures remain useful once that math is done:
For a family in the top bracket, the marginal tax value of a charitable dollar is now closer to 35 cents than 37, and the first half a percent of adjusted gross income in otherwise deductible gifts may produce no itemized benefit at all. A family funding a foundation, a donor-advised fund, or a multiyear pledge at real scale should model that math alongside its tax and legal advisors before year-end, rather than discover it on the return. Charitable vehicles carry their own legal formalities; your tax advisor and attorney should confirm the structure before you fund it.
Gain inventories, not harvesting decisions, are where families often fall short.
A year-end capital gain inventory should include public securities, concentrated stock, partnership interests, private company shares, carried interests, real estate, installment obligations, cryptocurrency, and equity compensation. For each position, the review should establish the cost basis and holding period, whether the gain is short-term or long-term, the state tax impact, any losses available to offset it, and whether a sale is being discussed, negotiated, or already locked in under a signed agreement.
Tax-loss harvesting can offset realized gains, but it is not a license to sell a sound investment purely to generate a tax number. The portfolio has to stay aligned with the family's investment plan and liquidity needs. A loss also must be real to count: the wash-sale rule disallows the loss if the same or a substantially identical security is bought back within 30 days before or after the sale, so replacement holdings need to be chosen with that window in mind. Harvesting gains can make just as much sense when a client is in a lower tax bracket for the year, holds capital losses that might otherwise go unused, wants to reset the cost basis, or has estate or concentration reasons (holding too much in one position) to trim it. A basis step-up at death can be valuable, but it is not a complete investment policy, and current law does not guarantee it will remain unchanged indefinitely.
The original Qualified Opportunity Zone program creates an unusually concrete deadline this year. Eligible gain deferred into a qualified opportunity fund under the original program generally becomes taxable on the earlier of a qualifying inclusion event, such as a sale of the fund interest, or December 31, 2026.
For many early QOF investors, deferral expires this year even though the fund interest itself stays illiquid. An investor may owe tax on deferred gain while holding an interest that produces no cash distribution, which is exactly why QOZ positions deserve review now rather than during tax return preparation.
Investors are not necessarily locked into the full original deferred gain. The amount includible in income generally equals the excess, if any, of (the lesser of the remaining deferred gain or the QOF interest's fair market value on December 31, 2026) over the investor's adjusted basis in that interest, and a well-supported independent valuation may matter where the interest is illiquid, lacks control, or has declined in value. An unsupported or aggressive discount carries its own risk: if the IRS successfully challenges the valuation, the investor can face accuracy-related penalties on top of the additional tax owed. The valuation approach and documentation should be reviewed with the investor's tax and valuation advisors.
We cover the appraisal mechanics, along with a worked example, in our article How a Qualified Appraisal May Affect Your 2026 QOF Tax Bill.
One more distinction matters here. The 2026 inclusion of original deferred gain generally cannot simply be reinvested to restart that same deferral. Separately, gain realized in a later qualifying transaction, or triggered by its own inclusion event, may be eligible for the revised post-2026 opportunity zone provisions if all statutory requirements are met and the investment is timely made on or after January 1, 2027. Those are two separate questions, and a family should analyze each on its own terms, apart from the eventual ten-year exit analysis that determines whether the investment still makes sense once the tax attributes are set aside. Deadlines and amounts vary by situation. Verify yours with your tax advisor.
The permanence of the current exemption removes one arbitrary deadline. It does not remove the reasons to make completed gifts, create trusts, recapitalize a family business, transfer minority interests, plan for succession, or allocate generation-skipping exemption.
Families should not make gifts because Congress might act someday. They should make gifts once they have a clear answer to a short set of questions: Does the donor retain enough capital, income, and flexibility? Is the asset likely to appreciate outside the donor's estate? Is there a governance, creditor protection, or succession reason for the transfer? Does the donor intend a completed gift, a retained interest structure, or a sale to a trust? Is a future basis step-up at death more valuable than the estate tax savings from gifting now?
The most valuable planning happens before a family needs it. Once a company sits under a letter of intent, a founder's health declines, or a family dispute begins, the available options narrow quickly.
A 2026 transfer can also be the foundational step in a 2027 transaction. Families may use this year to:
A hastily signed trust on December 29 rarely reflects a family's best governance thinking. Entity formation and trust funding carry specific legal requirements, so loop in both your attorney and your tax advisor well before year-end.
Low basis remains the central tension in every gifting decision. A completed lifetime gift carries the donor's basis. Property included in a decedent's estate may receive a basis adjustment at death. For a highly appreciated asset unlikely to create a taxable estate under the current exemption, holding the asset can sometimes produce a better family outcome than gifting it away purely to chase estate tax savings. The right answer depends on comparing after-tax, after-transfer-tax, control, and governance outcomes across a realistic range of life expectancy, appreciation, and tax scenarios, not on a fixed rule about low-basis assets.
For families expecting meaningful future appreciation, one technique to consider is a sale to a grantor trust (a trust whose creator pays the income tax on the trust’s earnings). A sale of this kind may, if properly structured and effective under applicable law, help transfer future appreciation outside the transferor’s taxable estate, and carefully designed note terms can add flexibility. The technique requires more than a promissory note and an optimistic valuation. It calls for a review of how well the trust is funded going in, the applicable federal rate (the minimum interest rate the IRS allows on such a loan), the cash flow available to service the note, and whether the family would still want the structure if the asset's value declined. A sale to a trust is a financing transaction between related parties, and it deserves the same discipline as any other one. Additional risks include note default, inadequate seed capital, valuation challenge, retained control, mortality, asset underperformance, and changed law.
These are practical planning targets rather than statutory filing deadlines, aside from the QOZ recognition date noted earlier. Your advisory team can confirm which items apply to your situation.
Year-end planning starts with a family's objectives: liquidity, succession, philanthropy, control, and preserving options.
In 2026, that means treating the year-end deadline as real while resisting the panic that used to come with it. The estate tax exemption is generous, but it should not invite complacency. QOZ deferred-gain recognition is approaching for many investors, but it should not lead to an artificial valuation. Income and capital gain planning can create real value when integrated with investment and cash-flow decisions. Charitable planning can remain powerful under the new rules, provided the giving is deliberately structured rather than assumed.
Families who use the fourth quarter to complete transactions that fit a multiyear plan, and document them properly, may enter 2027 with a stronger balance sheet, cleaner governance, and fewer decisions waiting for the next crisis.
Bringing a family's income, charitable, capital gain, and estate decisions together across its full advisory team is the kind of orchestration Next Vantage is designed to help provide. If your fourth quarter includes a QOZ recognition event, a gifting decision, or a business transaction, now is the time to bring your advisors around a shared plan. Schedule a conversation by calling (212) 433-1108 or emailing frice@nextcapitalmgmt.com. This article is educational and general in nature, and is not tax, legal, or investment advice.
Frazer Rice is Director of Family Office Services and a Partner at Next Vantage, the Family Office Services group of Next Capital Management in New York City, where he has spent more than two decades advising families navigating exceptional financial complexity.
Next Capital Management, LLC (“Company”) is an SEC registered investment adviser located in New York, New York.
Next Vantage is a separate non-advisory service/business offered by certain members of/associated with Next Capital Management, an SEC registered Investment Adviser located in New York. In addition to, and separate from, the investment advisory services offered by Next Capital Management affiliates through Next Capital Management, Next Vantage provides separate business services, including consultation on personal financial matters and coordination with unaffiliated professional service providers. While the Next Vantage service does not entail provision of investment advice, clients of Next Capital Management may decide to use Next Vantage for related non-investment services. Next Vantage personnel may have a financial incentive to recommend the services of Next Capital Management. Clients are under no obligation to use Next Capital Management and may select any provider of their choice. Next Vantage is not a separately registered investment adviser. Next Vantage does not provide legal or accounting services. Next Vantage clients should consult their legal or tax professional for these services.
The Company may only transact business in those states in which it is registered, or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration requirements. The Company’s website is limited to the dissemination of general information pertaining to its advisory services, together with access to additional investment-related information, publications, and links. Accordingly, the publication of the Company’s website on the Internet should not be construed by any consumer and/or prospective client as the Company’s solicitation to effect, or attempt to effect transactions in securities, or the rendering of personalized investment advice for compensation, over the Internet. Any subsequent, direct communication by the Company with a prospective client shall be conducted by a representative that is either registered or qualifies for an exemption or exclusion from registration in the state where the prospective client resides. A copy of the Company’s current written disclosure Brochure and Form CRS discussing the Company’s business operations, services, and fees is available on this website and/or from the Company upon written request. The Company does not make any representations or warranties as to the accuracy, timeliness, suitability, completeness, or relevance of any information prepared by any unaffiliated third party, whether linked to the Company’s website or incorporated herein, and takes no responsibility therefor. All such information is provided solely for convenience purposes only and all users thereof should be guided accordingly.
Please remember that different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy (including those undertaken or recommended by the Company), will be profitable or equal any historical performance level(s). Neither the Company’s investment adviser registration status, nor any amount of prior experience or success, should be construed that a certain level of results or satisfaction will be achieved if the Company is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services. The Company’s registration status does not imply a specific level of skill or training.
Certain portions of the Company’s website (i.e., newsletters, articles, commentaries, etc.) may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, the Company’s (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) positions and/or recommendations as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current position(s) and/or recommendation(s). Moreover, no client or prospective client should assume that any such discussion serves as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized advice from the Company, or from any other investment professional. The Company is neither an attorney nor an accountant, and no portion of the website content should be interpreted as legal, accounting or tax advice.
Please Note: Limitations. Neither rankings nor recognitions by unaffiliated rating services, publications, media, or other organizations, nor the achievement of any professional designation, certification, degree, or license, membership in any professional organization, or any amount of prior experience or success, should be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that the client will experience a certain level of results if the investment professional or the investment professional’s firm is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services.
To the extent that any client or prospective client utilizes any economic calculator or similar interactive device contained within or linked to the Company’s website, the client and/or prospective client acknowledges and understands that the information resulting from the use of any such calculator/device, is not, and should not be construed, in any manner whatsoever, as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized individual advice from the Company, or from any other investment professional.
This article is for general educational purposes only and is not tax, legal, accounting, valuation, insurance, or individualized investment advice. Tax, estate, charitable, trust, and QOZ planning outcomes depend on each person’s facts, applicable law, transaction documents, valuations, and timely implementation. Neither tax savings nor any particular investment, estate-planning, or charitable result is guaranteed. Consult qualified independent tax, legal, valuation, and other advisers before acting.
Qualified Opportunity Zone rules are complex. The amount and timing of any deferred-gain inclusion, the tax treatment of a QOF interest, and the relevance of any valuation depend on the investor’s specific facts and applicable federal and state law. An appraisal or valuation does not assure a particular tax outcome and may be subject to IRS review.
Gifts, trust transactions, entity planning, and sales to trusts can involve transfer-tax, income-tax, valuation, fiduciary, liquidity, creditor, and administrative risks. These strategies may not be appropriate for every family and should be implemented only with advice from qualified legal and tax professionals.
References to securities sales, rebalancing, tax-loss harvesting, concentrated positions, and other investment considerations are general in nature and are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any security or to implement any investment strategy.